Low emittance 2000MeV 12 wigglers. 19kg. 6 wigglers in L0

May 6, 2008 Lattice: /nfs/cesr/user/dlr/lat/des/CesrTF/ctf_20080403/ctf_20080403
same as /home/dlr/lat/cta/cta_2000_v8_080403.lat
Layout: /dlr/layout/layout_cesrta_v8.bmad - Up to date as of April 2008

Energy [GeV] 2.0
Wiggler[T] 1.9
Qx 14.57
Qy 9.6
Qz [8.08MV] 0.075
Emittance [nm] 2.5
Momentum compaction 6.7e-3


  • linear lattice constraints
  • non linear lattice constraints energy offset +- 0.003 and disp

  • lattice file BMAD and MAD format
  • Optical parameters and orbits

  • RF voltage = 8.08, Qs=-0.075, Bunch length = 9mm


    Tune scan
    Tune scan gif and (initialization) with Qz = -0.075


    Dynamic aperture
    The dynamic aperture gif ( ps ) and (initialization) .Qx=14.57 Qy=9.6,Qz=-0.075. The horizontal and vertical tunes are shifted in order to avoid the synchrobetatron line that shifts with the lower synchrotron tune. (See tune scans)

    Dynamic aperture is computed for fractional energy offset of 0%, 0.5% and 1%. Tracking is based on symplectic integration through the same wiggler map as for CESR-c calculations. Particles are considered lost if their amplitude >> the real physical aperture. (This seems to be the way linear collider damping ring people report dynamic aperture.) The smooth yellow curve corresponds to 3sigma, where sigma is the rms size of the "injected" beam, which is again the custom of damping ring afficiondos. The horizontal emittance of the injected beam is assumed to be 1000nm, and fully coupled so that the vertical emittance is half the horizontal (500nm), just like for the real ILC damping rings. (I believe this is also Jeremy's custom.) And that is real physical emittance, not normalized.


    Analyzer output