Introduction
Message on HyperNews by Werner
The beam energy shift centers the D0->KPi MBC peak at 1.8645 GeV. The real value of the D0 mass is 0.3 MeV higher (according to Amiran's new measurement). This means the reported center-of-mass energy is 0.6 MeV low compared to the "true" value. Therefore, to get the correct interaction between the psi(3770) lineshape and the reported Ecm, the value of M[psi(3770)] used in our lineshape must be 0.6 MeV higher than the true mass. In other words, since we take M[psi(3770)]=3774.0 MeV in our fits, we think the true value is really 3773.4 MeV, which is 1.0 MeV, or 2 sigma, from the new BES value of 3772.4 +- 0.5 MeV [hep-ex/0612056].
Another one:
Ha! That was a test to see if I could trick anyone into believing my flawed logic.... I think I got it backwards. If we use M[psi(3770)] = 3774.0 MeV with the reported Ecm, that's equivalent to using M[psi(3770)] = 3774.6 MeV with the true Ecm = reported + 0.6 MeV. This moves us *away* from the BES value; 4.4 sigma away.
Process
We fit the psi(3770) with mass 3.7724 GeV and width 28.6 MeV1. Compare with our regular fits which has mass of 3.774 GeV and width 27.5 GeV. Since we use the same lineshape parameter for both signal MC and generic MC, the difference arises only in the data. The "diff(%)" is calculated by2:
/ Yields( test ) \ | -------------------- - 1 | X 100 \ Yields(regular) /
Mode | data diff(%) |
---|---|
D0 &rarr K- &pi+ | 0.54 |
D 0&rarr K+ &pi- | 0.52 |
D0 &rarr K- &pi+ &pi0 | 0.80 |
D 0&rarr K+ &pi- &pi0 | 0.83 |
D0 &rarr K- &pi+ &pi- &pi+ | 0.83 |
D 0&rarr K+ &pi- &pi+ &pi- | 0.83 |
D+ &rarr K- &pi+ &pi+ | 0.50 |
D- &rarr K+ &pi- &pi- | 0.51 |
D+ &rarr K- &pi+ &pi+ &pi0 | 0.81 |
D- &rarr K+ &pi- &pi- &pi0 | 0.80 |
D+ &rarr KS0 &pi+ | 0.65 |
D- &rarr KS0&pi- | 0.59 |
D+ &rarr KS0 &pi+ &pi0 | 0.78 |
D- &rarr KS0&pi- &pi0 | 0.75 |
D+ &rarr KS0 &pi+ &pi+ &pi- | 0.98 |
D- &rarr KS0&pi- &pi- &pi+ | 1.02 |
D+ &rarr K+ K- &pi+ | 0.92 |
D- &rarr K- K+ &pi- | 0.93 |
Conclusion
The difference is small, negligible?