04/20/2007
Triple check the log plots
Update the plots in cbx
dhad update cbx plot
180 plots updated.
check in to cvs
The generic double tag plots still have the same feature on 201,201.
Send message on Hypernews
Compare with old fits
Message from Werner:
For 56 pb-1: Standard fit: /home/wsun/cleo-c/dhad/fits/20050330/dataNewLumi.com No-FSR fit: /home/wsun/cleo-c/dhad/fits/20050222/dataNoFSR.com Double tag efficiencies start at line 780, and the modes are 46 lines apart. The order of modes is given near the top of the file, starting at line 42.
04/23/2007
Create 56/pb eff table
- Create single tag
dhad table single_eff_56
04/25/2007
Create 56/pb eff table
dhad table compare eff single 56 281
dhad table compare eff double 56 281
dhad table compare eff single noFSR 56 281
dhad table compare eff double noFSR 56 281
post on hyper news ... done.
04/26/2007
Add more comparison tables
Message from Werner:
These tables are very useful, but would it be possible to add two more? Ultimately, what we're interested in is the efficiency ratio eff(no FSR)/eff(with FSR) for single and double tags, compared between 56/pb and 281/pb.
dhad table compare eff single noFSR withFSR ratio 56 281
dhad table compare eff double noFSR withFSR ratio 56 281
post on hypernews done.
04/27/2007
Fit with BES lineshape
- Fit the double tags :
dhad fit BES2006lineshape Gamma 0.0286 M 3.7718 -t d —tag d —qsub
Create tables
dhad table compare eff double noFSR withFSR ratio over single 56 281
post on hypernews ... done.
Fix sigma 6.5 do the lineshape fit
sigmacommon1=new RooRealVar("sigmacommon1","sigmacommon1",0.0065);
dhad fit floatmass fitparams diag sigmacommon1 6.5 -t s —tag d -m203,203 —qsub
Change the .C code back when finished ...
04/30/2007
Check the BES lineshape fit
done.