International Workshop on HOM Damping in Superconducting RF Cavities
 October 11 -13, 2010
  
 701 Clark Hall, Cornell University
  
 Agenda  
PDF version Monday, October 11, 2010 9:00 – 9:15: Welcome (M. Liepe) 9:15 – 11:00: HOM damping requirements for various projects
Session Chair: I. Ben-Zvi Task: Collect key HOM specs for different projects.
-  HOM damping requirements for SRF deflecting cavities (A. Nassiri, 15 min)
 -  Higher order mode damping considerations for the SPL cavities at CERN (W. Weingarten, 15 min)
 -  HOMs in the Project X linac (V. Yakovlev, 15 min)
 -  HOM damping requirements for various projects (all, 30 min total)
-  Bunch length, bunch charge, beam current, number of cavities
 -  Cavity frequency, number of cells, longitudinal loss factor at design bunch length
 -  Single bunch HOM power spectrum
 -  Average HOM power per cavity (k*Qb*I)
 -  Worst case peak HOM power per cavity in case of resonant excitation of modes
 -  Required damping (typical Q-values only!) of monopole, dipole, and quadrupole modes
 
 -  Bunch length, bunch charge, beam current, number of cavities
 - Discussion: HOM damping requirements (all, 30 min total)
 
Session Chair: I. Ben-Zvi
- A comparison of the HOM damping efficiency for various SRF coupler schemes (F. Marhauser, 30 min)
 
-  HOM Damper and Filter Design for 56MHz SRF Cavity for RHIC (Qiong Wu, 20 min)
 -  HOM Damping Properties of Fundamental Power Couplers in the Superconducting Electron Gun of the Energy Recovery LINAC at BNL (L. Hammons, 20 min)
 -  Capacitive-Antennae HOM Damper (H. Hahn, 20 min)
 -  New HOM coupler design for High Current Superconducting cavity (W. Xu, 20 min)
 -  Experience with 3.9 GHz loop couplers (T. Khabiboulline, 20 min)
 -  Heating in DESY style HOM couplers in cw operation (J. Sekutowicz, 20 min)
 -  Heating of HOM loop couplers in CW mode (W.Anders/A.Neumann, 20 min)
 -  HOM damping variations in SRF cavities (F. Marhauser, 20 min)
 -  Optimization of HOM Couplers using Different Time Domain Schemes (C. Potratz, 20 min)
 -  Computation of Coupler Damping Properties in Concatenated Arrangements (H.-W. Glock, 20 min)
 -  Discussion: antenna based HOM damping (all, 40 min)
-  Effective HOM damping frequency range
-  Coupling to high frequency modes?
 
 -  Coupling to high frequency modes?
 -  Measured and/or simulated HOM Q-values for given cavity design vs. frequency (no BBU simulation results!)
-  Coupling to monopole, dipole, and quadrupole modes
 -  How many antenna/loop couplers are required per cavity to guarantee effective damping for all polarization angles?
 -  Design and results from DESY, TJNAF, BNL
 
 -  Coupling to monopole, dipole, and quadrupole modes
 -  Maximum HOM power handling and extraction
-  Estimate of the heat load to ~2K and all other intercept temperatures at full HOM power
 
 -  Estimate of the heat load to ~2K and all other intercept temperatures at full HOM power
 -  Coupling to the fundamental mode and suppression
-  Thermal limitations, e.g. long pulse vertical test (DESY), cw-version for the CEBAF upgrade cavities
 -  High thermal conduction feedthroughs
 -  Niobium or Cu antenna? Impact on cost?
 -  Filter design and tuning, especially with large number of couplers per cavity. Reliability/ success rate?
 -  Filter always needed?
 
 -  Thermal limitations, e.g. long pulse vertical test (DESY), cw-version for the CEBAF upgrade cavities
 -  Cleanness challenges and solutions
-  Field emission
 -  Trap sulfur during EP?
 
 -  Field emission
 -  Extra beamline length required per cavity (compared to linac without HOM damping)
 -  Mechanical / fabrication challenges and solutions
-  FNAL experience at 3.9 GHz and SNS experience
 -  Multipacting
 -  Mechanical failure
 
 -  FNAL experience at 3.9 GHz and SNS experience
 -  Cost vs. design and material choices
-  Niobium vs. normal conducting
 -  Filter design and complexity
 -  Cabling; load inside our outside of vacuum vessel?
 
 -  Niobium vs. normal conducting
 -  Other challenges, limitations and solutions
 
 -  Effective HOM damping frequency range
 
Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:00 – 10:00 AM: Waveguide HOM damping
Session Chair: S. Belomestnykh
-  Waveguide HOM damping studies at JLAB (R. Rimmer, 30 min)
 -  Discussion: waveguide HOM damping (all, 30 min)
-  Effective HOM damping frequency range
-  Coupling to high frequency modes?
 
 -  Coupling to high frequency modes?
 -  Measured and/or simulated HOM Q-values for given cavity design vs. frequency (no BBU simulation results!)
-  TJNAF designs and results
 
 -  TJNAF designs and results
 -  Maximum HOM power handling and extraction
-  Estimate of the heat load to ~2K and all other intercept temperatures at full HOM power
 
 -  Estimate of the heat load to ~2K and all other intercept temperatures at full HOM power
 -  Coupling to the fundamental mode and suppression
 -  Cleanness challenges and solutions
-  Cleaning of waveguide sections
 
 -  Cleaning of waveguide sections
 -  Extra beamline length required per cavity (compared to linac without HOM damping)
 -  Mechanical / fabrication challenges and solutions
 -  Cost vs. design and material choices
-  Superconducting or normal conducting waveguide sections?
 -  Number of waveguides per cavity required
 -  Length of waveguide section
 -  Absorber inside or outside of vacuum vessel?
 -  Water cooling vs. cryogens; risks involved
 -  Temperature of loads at end of waveguides
 -  Shielding of IR radiation from warm load
 -  Water cooling and mechanical cavity vibrations
 
 -  Superconducting or normal conducting waveguide sections?
 - Other challenges, limitations and solutions
 
 -  Effective HOM damping frequency range
 
Session Chair: M. Liepe
-  RF absorber studies at Cornell, part 1 (V. Shemelin, 20 min)
 -  RF absorber studies at Cornell, including DC conductivity, part 2 (E. Chojnacki, 20 min)
 -  RF absorber studies at KEK (M. Sawamura, 20 min)
 -  Measurements of absorber materials from room temperature to 2K (F. Marhauser, 20 min)
 -  Discussion: HOM absorbing materials (all, 40 min)
-  Room temperature and cryogenic material complex mu & eps (temperature dependence of absorption) of various dissipative materials vs. frequency (ferrites, ceramic with carbon, CNT…)
 -  DC conductivity of dissipative materials and its temperature dependence
 -  Mechanical and thermal properties of dissipative materials
 -  Vacuum properties of dissipative materials
 -  Coatings and other methods to avid electrostatic charging of dissipative materials
 -  Fabrication of dissipative materials and reliability of achieving specs
 - Fabrication cost of different dissipative materials
 
 -  Room temperature and cryogenic material complex mu & eps (temperature dependence of absorption) of various dissipative materials vs. frequency (ferrites, ceramic with carbon, CNT…)
 
Session Chair: M. Liepe
-  Ferrite HOM Load Surrounding a Ceramic Break (L. Hammons, 20 min)
 -  Absorbing materials for beamline absorbers: How good is good enough? (N. Valles, 20 min)
 -  Experience with the Cornell ERL beamline absorber prototype and future plans (E. Chojnacki, 30 min)
 -  Resonant HOM load made of a resistive material (V. Shemelin, 20 min)
 -  Test of the Beam Line Absorber at FLASH (J. Sekutowicz, 20 min)
 -  Cooling test of HOM absorber model for cERL in Japan (M. Sawamura, 30 min)
 -  Operation Experience of HOM absorbers at KEKB (T. Furuya, 20 min)
 -  Beamline absorber work at Muon, Inc (R. Johnson, 20 min)
 -  Design and Application of the High-Efficiency HOM Absorbers at PEP-II (A. Novokhatski, 20 min)
 -  Discussion: beamline absorbers (all, 40 min)
-  Effective HOM damping frequency range
 -  Measured and/or simulated HOM Q-values for given cavity design vs. frequency (no BBU simulation results!)
-  Cornell, DESY, BNL, KEK designs
 
 -  Cornell, DESY, BNL, KEK designs
 -  Maximum HOM power handling and extraction
-  What is the optimal operating temperature?
 -  Heat transfer and thermal connections
 -  Estimate of the heat load to ~2K and all other intercept temperatures at full HOM power
 
 -  What is the optimal operating temperature?
 -  Coupling to the fundamental mode and suppression
 -  Cleanness challenges and solutions
-  Cleaning of absorber materials
 -  Risk of particle generation?
 -  How to quantify the absence or presence of RF absorber material particulate generation that could spoil the Q of nearby SRF cavities?
 -  Coatings?
 
 -  Cleaning of absorber materials
 -  Extra beamline length required per cavity (compared to linac without HOM damping)
 -  Mechanical / fabrication challenges and solutions
-  Are bellow sections between cavities needed / desirable?
 -  Heat intercept and static heat loads to cavities
 -  Brazing, soldering, metallization of ceramics/ferrites to heat sinks.
 -  Absorber tiles vs. rings
 -  Accurate mechanical modeling that includes plastic deformation of material.
 
 -  Are bellow sections between cavities needed / desirable?
 -  Cost vs. design and material choices
-  Thermal matching of heat sinks to ceramic/ferrites
 -  Copper coating of beam pipe sections or stainless steel?
 
 -  Thermal matching of heat sinks to ceramic/ferrites
 - Other challenges, limitations and solutions
 
 -  Effective HOM damping frequency range
 
Wednesday, October 13, 2010 9:00 – 10:15 AM: RF simulation tools (2D, 3D)
Session Chair: E. Chojnacki
-  ACE3P and HOM power flow in the Cornell ERL (Liling Xiao, 20 min)
 -  HOM simulations with ANSYS (S. Posen, 20 min)
 -  Higher Order Mode Heating Analysis for the ILC Superconducting Linacs (C.r Nantista, 20 min)
 -  Discussion: HOM simulations (all, 15 min)
-  Which problems need 3D models?
 -  Which problems require only 2D?
 -  Which 3D software allows complex mu & eps?
 -  Which 3D software is up to the job?
 -  Which 2D software allows complex mu & eps?
 -  Which 2D software is up to the job?
 -  FEM vs. FD codes
 -  How high in frequency can/should one go?
 -  How much can one trust the simulations? What safety factor should be included? Comparison of simulations and measurements.
 -  Time domain vs. frequency domain
 - Choice of boundary conditions at cavity beam tube ends (open, electric, magnetic). What is realistic for a large linac installation?
 
 -  Which problems need 3D models?
 
Session Chair: E. Chojnacki
-  RF absorber studies using waveguides in transmission Part 1 | Part 2 (E. Chojnacki, 20 min; V. Shemelin, 20 min)
 -  HOM-BPMs at the 3.9 GHz Superconducting Cavities for FLASH and the European XFEL (R.M. Jones, 20 min)
 -  Experiments on HOM Spectrum Manipulation in a ILC 1.3 GHz Cavity (T. Khabiboulline, 20  min)
 -  Discussion: HOM measurements
-  Measurement methods of RF absorbing materials (complex mu & eps, mechanical properties…)
 -  Cornell waveguide method, terminated waveguide (TJNAF), resonator methods, …which method gives reliable data at operating temperatures?
-  DC conductivity, mechanical and thermal methods
 
 -  DC conductivity, mechanical and thermal methods
 -  Measurements in cavities and cavity prototypes (copper)
-  How much can one trust HOM measurements on individual cavities?
 -  Boundary conditions at beam tubes?
 -  Are cold measurements needed?
 -  Are beam measurements needed?
 - Are copper modes needed?
 
 -  How much can one trust HOM measurements on individual cavities?
 
 -  Measurement methods of RF absorbing materials (complex mu & eps, mechanical properties…)
 
-  Summary of HOM damping schemes currently available and fully developed, including parameter specs (frequency range, power handling capabilities...)
 -  Summary of future, potential performance of improved versions, including outstanding challenges/problems, potential solutions, and R&D path
 - Volunteers to perform the R&D, the time frame, and report the results
 


